C2RaccontoCarriera4 min
Someone Else’s Words
Lorna scrive i discorsi di una presidente del consiglio di amministrazione — e si accorge di quanto sia difficile essere sinceri con la voce di un’altra.
Una storia sullo scrivere per gli altri. Fai attenzione alle frasi lunghe e articolate e alle nominalizzazioni (the gap between, a willingness to): portano avanti il ragionamento di Lorna. E fai attenzione a chi parla davvero alla fine.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She had begun in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences, and had ended up, by a route she could no longer quite reconstruct, writing for the chair of a large insurance company: a precise, reserved woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people imagined and more personal than they would have believed. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, one had to listen not only to what they said but to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would sooner cancel a speech than describe a bad year as “a year of learning”. Over time Lorna had come to hear the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes, to her mild alarm, in her own head when she was not working at all.
The speech that changed things was a routine one: the annual address to staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. The first draft, which Lorna had written in the measured tone the event seemed to require, came back with a single line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
Lorna’s first reaction was to feel annoyed; her second, considerably less comfortable, was recognition. She had not been there. She had read the figures and the reports, but she had not sat in the rooms where the decisions were taken, and the text showed it. What Margaret wanted, it turned out, was not a better-written speech but a less protected one: an admission that the decision had been hers, that she was not certain it had been right, and that she would understand if some of those listening were angry with her.
They spent two evenings on it, which had never happened before. Margaret talked; Lorna asked questions and, for once, wrote down almost exactly what she heard rather than improving it. The final version was shorter than any speech Lorna had ever delivered and contained, by her count, three sentences that she would have cut on grammatical grounds alone.
Afterwards, several people wrote to Margaret to say that it was the first time a speech from the top had sounded like a person. Lorna read the messages with a feeling she found hard to name. The praise belonged, as it should, to someone else. Yet she believed that the speech was the best thing she had ever written, precisely because so little of it was hers.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She started in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences. Now she wrote for the chair of a large insurance company, a precise, quiet woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people thought, but it was very personal. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, you have to listen to what they say, and also to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would never call a bad year “a year of learning”. After some time, Lorna heard the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes even when she was not working.
The important speech was a usual one: the annual speech to the staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. Lorna wrote the first version in a calm, careful tone. It came back with one line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
At first Lorna was annoyed. Then she understood that Margaret was right. She had read the numbers and the reports, but she had not been in the rooms where the decisions were made, and the text showed it. Margaret wanted not a better-written speech but a less protected one. She wanted to say that the decision had been hers, that she was not sure it was right, and that she understood if some people were angry with her.
They worked on it for two evenings, which had never happened before. Margaret talked, and Lorna asked questions and wrote down almost exactly what she heard. The final speech was very short, and it had three sentences that Lorna would usually have changed because of the grammar.
Later, several people wrote to Margaret. They said that for the first time a speech from the top sounded like a real person. Lorna felt something she could not name. The praise belonged to someone else. But she thought that it was the best thing she had ever written, because so little of it was hers.
Un clic su una parola la cerca nel lessico di questo sito.
Altre frasi sul tema in «La lingua in azione»: Inglese per il lavoro e la carriera
- Parole
- 445
- Frasi
- 20
- Parole per frase
- 22,2
- nel lessico
- 100 %
- livello misurato
- C2
- Tempo di lettura
- 4 min
Grammatica in questo testo
Queste forme compaiono nel testo in un uso reale. Con «Mostra la grammatica», sopra il testo, vengono evidenziate.
an admission that the decision had been hers
Lo stile nominale condensa: an admission that the decision had been hers invece di she admitted that …. Lo stile nominale →
What Margaret wanted
Una frase scissa con What: What Margaret wanted … was not … Le frasi scisse →
would sooner cancel a speech than
would sooner … than = preferirebbe … piuttosto che: una preferenza forte. Chiedere con cortesia →
Le parole da C2 in su in questo testo
Non le parole difficili in assoluto, ma quelle del tuo livello: tutte le 1 delle 224 parole di questo testo sono di livello C2 o superiore. Tutto il resto lo conosci già, se sei arrivato fin qui.
to reconstruct
ricostruire
C2
Le liste di parole di questo testo
Le parole di questo testo si trovano in 42 liste di questo sito; il numero accanto dice quante vengono da ciascuna lista. Chi ha letto il testo ha appena avuto bisogno proprio di queste parole — e può ripassare esattamente quelle.
Domande di comprensione
5 domande sul testo. A ogni risposta compare la frase in cui si trova — una domanda la cui risposta non si ritrova nel testo non verifica niente.
1. Di che cosa diffidava Margaret?
Leggi la fine del primo paragrafo.
Fai attenzione a «did not trust».
did not trust big words or loud praise
2. Secondo l’esperienza di Lorna, che cosa bisogna fare per scrivere bene per qualcuno?
Leggi il secondo paragrafo.
Fai attenzione alla parola «avoided».
to what they usually avoided saying
3. Che cosa significa la nota a margine di Margaret?
Leggi la fine del terzo paragrafo.
Fai attenzione a «not there» e alla reazione di Lorna subito dopo.
This sounds like someone who was not there
4. Che cosa voleva davvero Margaret dal discorso?
Leggi il quarto paragrafo.
Fai attenzione a «not … but».
not a better-written speech but a less protected one
5. Perché Lorna considera quel discorso il suo migliore?
La risposta è nell’ultima frase.
Fai attenzione alla parola «precisely».
precisely because so little of it was hers