C2GeschichteBeruf4 Min.
Someone Else’s Words
Lorna schreibt die Reden einer Vorstandsvorsitzenden — und merkt, wie schwer es ist, mit fremder Stimme ehrlich zu sein.
Eine Geschichte über das Schreiben für andere. Achte auf die langen, verschachtelten Sätze und auf die Nominalisierungen (the gap between, a willingness to): Sie tragen Lornas Nachdenken. Und achte darauf, wer am Ende eigentlich spricht.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She had begun in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences, and had ended up, by a route she could no longer quite reconstruct, writing for the chair of a large insurance company: a precise, reserved woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people imagined and more personal than they would have believed. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, one had to listen not only to what they said but to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would sooner cancel a speech than describe a bad year as “a year of learning”. Over time Lorna had come to hear the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes, to her mild alarm, in her own head when she was not working at all.
The speech that changed things was a routine one: the annual address to staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. The first draft, which Lorna had written in the measured tone the event seemed to require, came back with a single line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
Lorna’s first reaction was to feel annoyed; her second, considerably less comfortable, was recognition. She had not been there. She had read the figures and the reports, but she had not sat in the rooms where the decisions were taken, and the text showed it. What Margaret wanted, it turned out, was not a better-written speech but a less protected one: an admission that the decision had been hers, that she was not certain it had been right, and that she would understand if some of those listening were angry with her.
They spent two evenings on it, which had never happened before. Margaret talked; Lorna asked questions and, for once, wrote down almost exactly what she heard rather than improving it. The final version was shorter than any speech Lorna had ever delivered and contained, by her count, three sentences that she would have cut on grammatical grounds alone.
Afterwards, several people wrote to Margaret to say that it was the first time a speech from the top had sounded like a person. Lorna read the messages with a feeling she found hard to name. The praise belonged, as it should, to someone else. Yet she believed that the speech was the best thing she had ever written, precisely because so little of it was hers.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She started in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences. Now she wrote for the chair of a large insurance company, a precise, quiet woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people thought, but it was very personal. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, you have to listen to what they say, and also to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would never call a bad year “a year of learning”. After some time, Lorna heard the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes even when she was not working.
The important speech was a usual one: the annual speech to the staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. Lorna wrote the first version in a calm, careful tone. It came back with one line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
At first Lorna was annoyed. Then she understood that Margaret was right. She had read the numbers and the reports, but she had not been in the rooms where the decisions were made, and the text showed it. Margaret wanted not a better-written speech but a less protected one. She wanted to say that the decision had been hers, that she was not sure it was right, and that she understood if some people were angry with her.
They worked on it for two evenings, which had never happened before. Margaret talked, and Lorna asked questions and wrote down almost exactly what she heard. The final speech was very short, and it had three sentences that Lorna would usually have changed because of the grammar.
Later, several people wrote to Margaret. They said that for the first time a speech from the top sounded like a real person. Lorna felt something she could not name. The praise belonged to someone else. But she thought that it was the best thing she had ever written, because so little of it was hers.
Ein Klick auf ein Wort schlägt es im Wortschatz dieser Seite nach.
Mehr Sätze dazu in „Sprache im Einsatz“: Englisch für Beruf und Karriere
- Wörter
- 445
- Sätze
- 20
- Wörter je Satz
- 22,2
- im Wortschatz
- 100 %
- gemessene Stufe
- C2
- Lesedauer
- 4 Min.
Grammatik in diesem Text
Diese Formen stehen im Text in echtem Gebrauch. Mit „Grammatik zeigen“ über dem Text werden sie farbig markiert.
an admission that the decision had been hers
Nominalstil verdichtet: an admission that the decision had been hers statt she admitted that …. Nominalstil →
What Margaret wanted
Ein Spaltsatz mit What: What Margaret wanted … was not … Cleft-Sätze: It was … who →
would sooner cancel a speech than
would sooner … than = würde eher … als: eine starke Vorliebe. Höflich fragen und bitten →
Die Wörter ab C2 in diesem Text
Nicht die schweren Wörter überhaupt, sondern die deiner Stufe: alle 1 von 224 Wörtern dieses Textes stehen auf C2 oder darüber. Alles andere kennst du, wenn du hier angekommen bist.
to reconstruct
rekonstruieren
C2
Die Wortlisten zu diesem Text
Die Wörter dieses Textes stehen in 42 Listen dieser Seite; die Zahl dahinter sagt, wie viele davon aus welcher Liste kommen. Wer den Text gelesen hat, hat gerade diese Wörter gebraucht — und kann genau sie abfragen.
Verständnisfragen
5 Fragen zum Text. Zu jeder Antwort erscheint der Satz, in dem sie steht — eine Frage, deren Antwort man im Text nicht wiederfindet, prüft nichts.
1. Wem misstraute Margaret?
Lies das Ende des ersten Absatzes.
Achte auf „did not trust“.
did not trust big words or loud praise
2. Was muss man nach Lornas Erfahrung tun, um gut für jemanden zu schreiben?
Lies den zweiten Absatz.
Achte auf das Wort „avoided“.
to what they usually avoided saying
3. Was bedeutet Margarets Randbemerkung?
Lies das Ende des dritten Absatzes.
Achte auf „not there“ und auf Lornas Reaktion danach.
This sounds like someone who was not there
4. Was wollte Margaret eigentlich von der Rede?
Lies den vierten Absatz.
Achte auf „not … but“.
not a better-written speech but a less protected one
5. Warum hält Lorna diese Rede für ihre beste?
Die Antwort steht im letzten Satz.
Achte auf das Wort „precisely“.
precisely because so little of it was hers