C2HistoireCarrière4 min
Someone Else’s Words
Lorna écrit les discours d’une présidente de conseil d’administration — et découvre combien il est difficile d’être sincère avec la voix d’une autre.
Une histoire sur l’écriture pour autrui. Observe les phrases longues et imbriquées et les nominalisations (the gap between, a willingness to) : elles portent la réflexion de Lorna. Et observe qui parle vraiment à la fin.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She had begun in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences, and had ended up, by a route she could no longer quite reconstruct, writing for the chair of a large insurance company: a precise, reserved woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people imagined and more personal than they would have believed. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, one had to listen not only to what they said but to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would sooner cancel a speech than describe a bad year as “a year of learning”. Over time Lorna had come to hear the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes, to her mild alarm, in her own head when she was not working at all.
The speech that changed things was a routine one: the annual address to staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. The first draft, which Lorna had written in the measured tone the event seemed to require, came back with a single line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
Lorna’s first reaction was to feel annoyed; her second, considerably less comfortable, was recognition. She had not been there. She had read the figures and the reports, but she had not sat in the rooms where the decisions were taken, and the text showed it. What Margaret wanted, it turned out, was not a better-written speech but a less protected one: an admission that the decision had been hers, that she was not certain it had been right, and that she would understand if some of those listening were angry with her.
They spent two evenings on it, which had never happened before. Margaret talked; Lorna asked questions and, for once, wrote down almost exactly what she heard rather than improving it. The final version was shorter than any speech Lorna had ever delivered and contained, by her count, three sentences that she would have cut on grammatical grounds alone.
Afterwards, several people wrote to Margaret to say that it was the first time a speech from the top had sounded like a person. Lorna read the messages with a feeling she found hard to name. The praise belonged, as it should, to someone else. Yet she believed that the speech was the best thing she had ever written, precisely because so little of it was hers.
For eleven years Lorna had written words that other people said. She started in local politics, writing speeches for a politician who liked short sentences and long silences. Now she wrote for the chair of a large insurance company, a precise, quiet woman called Margaret who did not trust big words or loud praise.
The work was less glamorous than people thought, but it was very personal. To write well for someone, Lorna had learned, you have to listen to what they say, and also to what they usually avoided saying. Margaret never used the word “unique”. She would never call a bad year “a year of learning”. After some time, Lorna heard the sentences in Margaret’s voice before she wrote them, and sometimes even when she was not working.
The important speech was a usual one: the annual speech to the staff, in a year when the company had closed two offices and several hundred people had lost their jobs. Lorna wrote the first version in a calm, careful tone. It came back with one line in the margin: “This sounds like someone who was not there.”
At first Lorna was annoyed. Then she understood that Margaret was right. She had read the numbers and the reports, but she had not been in the rooms where the decisions were made, and the text showed it. Margaret wanted not a better-written speech but a less protected one. She wanted to say that the decision had been hers, that she was not sure it was right, and that she understood if some people were angry with her.
They worked on it for two evenings, which had never happened before. Margaret talked, and Lorna asked questions and wrote down almost exactly what she heard. The final speech was very short, and it had three sentences that Lorna would usually have changed because of the grammar.
Later, several people wrote to Margaret. They said that for the first time a speech from the top sounded like a real person. Lorna felt something she could not name. The praise belonged to someone else. But she thought that it was the best thing she had ever written, because so little of it was hers.
Un clic sur un mot le cherche dans le vocabulaire de ce site.
- Mots
- 445
- Phrases
- 20
- Mots par phrase
- 22,2
- dans le vocabulaire
- 100 %
- niveau mesuré
- C2
- Temps de lecture
- 4 min
La grammaire dans ce texte
Ces formes figurent dans le texte en situation réelle. Avec « Afficher la grammaire », au-dessus du texte, elles sont surlignées.
an admission that the decision had been hers
Le style nominal condense : an admission that the decision had been hers au lieu de she admitted that …. Le style nominal →
What Margaret wanted
Une phrase clivée avec What : What Margaret wanted … was not … Les phrases clivées →
would sooner cancel a speech than
would sooner … than = préférerait … plutôt que : une préférence marquée. Demander poliment →
Les mots à partir de C2 dans ce texte
Pas les mots difficiles en général, mais ceux de ton niveau : les 1 des 224 mots de ce texte sont au niveau C2 ou au-dessus. Le reste, tu le connais en arrivant ici.
to reconstruct
reconstituer
C2
Les listes de mots de ce texte
Les mots de ce texte figurent dans 42 listes de ce site ; le nombre qui suit indique combien viennent de chaque liste. Après la lecture, ce sont précisément ces mots dont on a eu besoin — et on peut réviser exactement ceux-là.
Questions de compréhension
5 questions sur le texte. À chaque réponse s’affiche la phrase où elle se trouve — une question dont on ne retrouve pas la réponse dans le texte ne vérifie rien.
1. De quoi Margaret se méfiait-elle ?
Lis la fin du premier paragraphe.
Fais attention à « did not trust ».
did not trust big words or loud praise
2. Selon l’expérience de Lorna, que faut-il faire pour bien écrire pour quelqu’un ?
Lis le deuxième paragraphe.
Fais attention au mot « avoided ».
to what they usually avoided saying
3. Que signifie la note de Margaret dans la marge ?
Lis la fin du troisième paragraphe.
Fais attention à « not there » et à la réaction de Lorna ensuite.
This sounds like someone who was not there
4. Qu’est-ce que Margaret voulait vraiment de ce discours ?
Lis le quatrième paragraphe.
Fais attention à « not … but ».
not a better-written speech but a less protected one
5. Pourquoi Lorna considère-t-elle ce discours comme son meilleur ?
La réponse est dans la dernière phrase.
Fais attention au mot « precisely ».
precisely because so little of it was hers